Subscribe to RSS
"As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord." (Joshua 24:15)

Help This Ministry

Sign Up 

 For a free subscription to The Layman and/or our weekly e-mail news alerts, click here.

 

All posts

Has worship gone to the dogs?

A Presbyterian Church (USA) congregation in Los Angeles has a worship service designed for people and their pets. Well, not just any pets. Specifically, dogs. (Cats are expressly prohibited, which seems specieist to me.) This “Canine-ite” worship experience begs the question (all puns intended), “what is worship really all about?” Glorifying God or accommodating every personal proclivity?

 

 

 

The actual Canaanites are the people of 11 nations who descend from Noah’s

 son, Ham (Genesis 9:25-27; 10:15-19; Deuteronomy 7:1; I Chronicles 1:13-16). They are described in the Bible as wicked, cursed, and it is the land of the Canaanites that is “given” by God to His chosen people.

 

 

There is only one Canaanite referred to in the New Testament, interestingly, it is also the only place where Jesus refers to canines. (Matthew 15:21-28) Notably, the Canaanite woman is described by Jesus as possessing “great faith,” something He only found in one other person, a Roman centurion (Matthew 8:5-11).

 

 

Maybe these L.A. pooches are dogs of great faith. They are, admittedly, still dogs and apparently when one of the “canine-ite” attendees goes to howling, the congregation responds by singing “Amazing Grace.”

 

So, what’s the motivation to include pets in worship? “The idea behind the service, Eggebeen said, was to make it more comfortable for people to attend the church ...” Ahhh. Now we’re getting somewhere. Is worship about my gratification or God’s glorification?

 

In the PCUSA Directory for Worship, Presbyterians acknowledge that worship is rightly directed to and centered upon God. Not the participants’ comfort zones. If we value anything, it is worship that is done “decently and in order.”

 

Did you notice anything about the “arrangement of space” in the photo that appears with the article? Sitting on the floor isn’t a problem, but sitting with our backs to the chancel is. The pastor is right that there is a great deal of latitude when it comes to what goes on in the context of Presbyterian worship, however, the Directory for Worship is clear on some points.

 

W-1.4001 reminds us that “The arrangement of space should visibly express the integral relation between Word and Sacrament and their centrality in Christian worship. Christ and the Biblical command to do all things in an orderly way. While Christian worship need not follow prescribed forms, careless or disorderly worship is both an offense to God and a stumbling block to the people. Those responsible for worship are to be guided by the Holy Spirit speaking in Scripture, the historic experience of the Church universal, the Reformed tradition, The Book of Confessions, the needs and particular circumstances of the worshiping community, as well as the provisions of the Form of Government and this directory. (W-3.1001; W-3.1002).”

 

Tithes and offerings also enter the picture as the people’s gifts are placed in the collection plate and they receive a dog biscuit in exchange. Just pause and consider that transaction. Presbyterians pass the plate on two occasions in worship: each week for the collection of the offering and periodically for the distribution of the Lord’s Supper. Anyone else see a problem with the conflagration of the imagery here? I know, you think I’m taking this too far. I would ask you, “how far is just far enough but not too far?”

 

The Humane Society and PETA are missing an opportunity here. I can almost see the headlines now, “Harry of Williamson house shut out of worship.” After all, Harry’s parents attend a Presbyterian church that does not welcome non-human congregants. Specieists!

 

As an exemplar, let me introduce Harry, hound of the Williamson clan and full member of the family. Why should Harry, who goes everywhere else with the Williamsons, not get to go to church? Why should Harry be abandoned for an hour to sit all alone in the heat of the summer sun or the chill of winter, in the church parking lot, shut out of services at FPC? Isn’t Harry one of God’s creatures? Certainly. Isn’t Harry a part of the family? Absolutely. Won’t Harry be redeemed with all creation at man’s redemption? Uh (pause, gulp, as I garner the courage to say this out loud), no. Contrary to popular belief and humanistic desire, all dogs do not go to heaven. Certainly not Harry, and there may be some question regarding the fate of his owners.

 

Now, to be clear, I certainly believe that if God were going to redeem specific creatures, the argument for dogs would be easy to make. Clearly cats are beyond the scope of those that would ever be considered “elect.” Dogs much more fully reflect the nature of God than other animals. They are “man’s best friend,” they love their people unconditionally, are quick to forgive and fiercely protective. Like us, dogs struggle to be obedient to their masters and sometimes fail to respond when called home. If we were to include animals in worship, dogs seem the best choice if for no other reason than they so obviously reflect (even in how Adam named them d-o-g mirroring G-o-d) the nature of God.

 

I anticipate that this blog will “unleash” quite a response!

 

Facebook DZone It! Digg It! StumbleUpon Technorati Del.icio.us NewsVine Reddit Blinklist Furl it!

Comments  15

  • munthu1@yahoo.com 8 Feb, 03:53 PM

    I would have you know that my cat, having learned her catechism, is a Christian cat. Leaving them out of the Kingdom would be a cat- tastrophe. Dogs, on the other hand, are capable of producing much doggerel. However, I don't wish to be dogmatic about this.

    Larry Brown, African Bible College
  • Forrest Norman 9 Feb, 12:49 PM

    Gives a whole new meaning to the phrase "Good shepherd."

    It's all sort of funny until you actually think about it. The theological implications are grave, as it so clearly mocks the idea of worship.

    So, I guess the Presbyterians can now join the Episcopalians in their infamous "clown communion" service.

    Lord forgive them all, for they really don't know what they're doing.
  • Dennis Russell 9 Feb, 01:57 PM

    While I agree with the basic premise of what you are asserting that there worship should be done decently and in order there is certainly no need to make worship into a circus. However I must take issue with your position of fido's finality. You are correct in stating that all dogs do not go to Heaven. However if I remember my eschatology correctly Humans do not ultimately end "UP" in heaven but rather on the re-newed earth. Therefore when all creation is redeemed I would not be suprised at all to see the family favorite fido there.
  • Tim Engleman 9 Feb, 03:55 PM

    The troubling aspect of the description of the photos is the assertion that there is a movement to recognize the emotional bond between people and their pets. Isn't acknowledgement of this bond enough? Where does "recognition" lead? Will there be a call to recognize a partnership between humans and animals? This may sound silly, but some things that were once silly are now contentious matters.
  • Peter Loughman 9 Feb, 10:33 PM

    Heard at the next session meeting, "Where do all those people with allergies now attend church?"
  • Carmen Fowler 10 Feb, 01:33 PM

    Dennis - You raise a provocative point. Certainly "all creation groans with eager longing for Man's redemption" in the knowledge of the promise that in the fullness of time God will "make all things new." We all await the reality of "a new heaven on a new earth" and anticipate that all the original goodness of Creation will be evident and experienced. One can only imagine! I anticipate with you that there will be dogs "there."
  • Robert E. McCaslin Jr 11 Feb, 04:47 PM

    I am a former PCUSA minister who left in disgust many years ago. I think it was the communion service dedicated to the goddess Sophia led by National church leadership that finally pushed me over the edge.
    When I was in seminary in Austin in the mid 80's the big emphasis was on Marxist theology and "inclusive language" with a strong dose of criticism leveled at the Trinity and names for God.

    so what else do you expect?

    thank you
  • John Tittle 11 Feb, 05:53 PM

    This post has made me revisit the idea dog-ma and cat-echism in church.

    Plus, I'll never look at the hymn the same:

    All creatures of our God and King
    Lift up your voice and with us sing,
    Alleluia! Alleluia!
  • Jennifer 11 Feb, 06:01 PM

    It just seems like a terrible distraction to me. I think we set aside that time each week to be with God, for meditation, prayer, song and fellowship with each other. You can see your dog all the rest of the week.
    There's a growing movement in churches to recognize the "emotional bond between people and their pets"? Who knew? And why?
  • Heidi Smith 11 Feb, 06:57 PM

    While I'm glad that no one is suggesting that dogs should be welcome at ALL services (the comment about allergies being particulary germaine), lest we forget, our Lord chose to be born into a stable full of animals when He chose to "tabernacle" among us. If that was "decent and in order" enough for Jesus, it's "decent and in order" enough for me...
  • Paulette Britton 12 Feb, 01:06 AM

    Seriously? Anything that detracts and distracts from a worship service steals God's glory and position in the service. Snooky and Skeeter can't be at home by themselves for an hour and a half? I guess next thing we'll see is the church changing it's name to PETra. I've heard of trying to usher in the end times but this is ridiculous.
  • Case Thorp 12 Feb, 08:46 AM

    Thank you, Carmen! Why is it that such silly events are overlooked by the leadership of the Presbytery and allowed to occur? Is there no shame left?

    I recently explained that all dogs, and especially cats, don't go to heaven in a sermon. The push back was tremendous showing me that even the average worshiper needs more instruction about creation, salvation, and redemption.
  • Ellis Phillips 12 Feb, 09:16 AM

    Heaven goes by favor. If it went by merit, you would stay out and your dog would go in.
    - Mark Twain, a Biography
  • Beloved Spear 12 Feb, 01:57 PM

    I figure, why not? Why not allow non-disruptive pets in a service? Honestly, dogs are less distracting in a service than kids. And as for our beloved critters being in heaven or not, I think it's going to be awfully hard for the lions to lay down with the lambs if there aren't any "up there." And last time I checked, Adam didn't toss the core of the Fruit of Good and Evil to his schnauzer. The sin of our fallen nature is a burden of humankind, not the living beings our Creator placed around us.
  • Keith Walston 4 Mar, 10:36 PM

    I am shocked at the humor expressed in many of the comments to this post. I find nothing humorous about this church or it's service. This mocks the reverent, spiritual, and holy nature of worship service. This is an example of the slippery slope that starts with tv monitors, electric guitars & drums, etc used to grow the church, appeal to a different demographic, etc. etc.. This is the reduction of the worship service to the lowest common denominator designed to appeal to the largest number of people. Removing the reverant and holy spiritual nature of the worship service and replacing it with an entertainment venue / living room is a sad commentary on how we "worship" or what we feel we must do to bring more people to Jesus. I do not attend worship to relax, unwind, or be entertained, I do not expect to hear a nice riff from the lead guitar or fancy computer driven graphics on a theater size screen, or a performance from a telegenic performer. Nor do I need to bring Georgia my lab with me in case I get bored or I just want something to pet. That's what college football season is for. I believe all you need for a great worship service is the fellowship of a christian congregation, the expressed faith and joy of a great leader, and the bible opened by the beadle to todays scripture.
Post a comment!

DISCLAIMER: The Layman Online is a news and information resource. We welcome letters and commentaries from readers. Letters and commentaries are selected for publication based on their clarity and brevity, subject to editing, and also are chosen to represent a diverse set of views on as many issues as possible. These letters and commentaries are provided as an informational service and do not necessarily indicate an endorsement by The Layman Online or the Presbyterian Lay Committee.