logo


Guest commentary
Imagine … "PCUSA
refers Jesus to task force!"


Renee Guth
Tucson, Ariz.
Tuesday, June 11, 2002
Imagine this headline, "PCUSA Refers Jesus to Task Force!" in your hometown newspaper, in the denominational press, and the puzzled expressions of the members of our congregations. Why would the 214th General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (USA) choose this option to a simple, unequivocal confession that Jesus Christ is the only Lord and Savior of the world? Why was this so difficult for the 213th General Assembly?

Our confessional and connectional heritage is inherently conflicted with an unrestrained exercise of the freedom of conscience. The Book of Order is clear that as church officers "one chooses to exercise the freedom of conscience within certain bounds" (G-6.0108b). These limits on the exercise of the freedom of conscience are necessary and defined, "It is necessary to the integrity and health of the church that the persons who serve in it as officers shall adhere to the essentials of the Reformed faith and the polity as expressed in The Book of Confessions and the Form of Government" (G-6.0108a). A confessional and connectional denomination will be unable to govern when it's officer's act as a non-creedal or congregational denomination.

Scripture proclaims Jesus as the only Savior and Lord of the world. As church officers the exercise of the freedom of conscience is also bound by the Scriptures. "That 'God alone is Lord of the conscience, and hath let it free from the doctrines and commandments of men which are in anything contrary to his Word, or beside it, in matters of faith or worship'"(Book of Order: G-1.0301a). Church officers are not free to act contrary to the Word of God. The witness of Scripture is clear:
  • The first commandment states, "You shall have no other gods before me." Our Lord's covenant with Israel defined an exclusive relationship between the one and only Lord God and his people. This is the witness of the Old Testament.
  • Jesus' self declaration as Israel's long awaited Messiah and the Son of the Living God points to his exclusively unique role in history: Jesus is fully God and fully human.
  • Jesus' prayer in Gethsemane indicates that he hoped for a different way from the cross, "If it is possible, may this cup be taken from me." If either Jesus or the Father knew of another way… why the cross? If Jesus is truly one of many, then was he a self-absorbed co-dependent who martyred himself? Or is he who he claims to be… the only Savior who knowingly prayed in the garden, "Not my will, but your will be done." This is the witness of the Gospels.
  • From the very beginning, Jesus and the early Christian church proclaimed Jesus Christ as the sole Savior and Lord of all to various Jewish sects, local cultic, Greek, and Roman religions, and various philosophical persuasions. Making ultimate claims about Jesus' Lordship, they met other world religions, faith-claims, and truth-claims with conviction. Even in the face of strident opposition, persecution, and martyrdom, the early church persisted in their confession. They persuasively presented the uncompromising gospel of Jesus Christ; "Jesus is the Savior and Lord of all!" This is the witness of the New Testament. Today we face the same plurality of faith and truth-claims. What will the 214th GA's witness be?
Why is it necessary for the 214th General Assembly to confess that Jesus is the only Lord and Savior of the world?
  • Our church remains divided against itself. Our most pivotal commitment is to the sole Lordship of Jesus Christ.
  • Our common understanding of the Lordship of Jesus Christ is the very heart of both our identity and mission as the Presbyterian Church (USA).
  • Since the General Assembly Council's stated priorities are evangelism and discipleship, we need a clear message to proclaim and teach. Without a clear message, evangelism efforts digress to membership recruitment to an organization of conflicted meaning and purpose.
  • The simple confession that Jesus is the only Savior and Lord of the world does not merit the expense or need for further study. Rather, the development of apologetic and missional approaches for the gospel in the cultural context of relativism, individualism, and deconstructionism would be instrumental to the denomination's stated ministry and mission.
  • This issue is not too complicated for General Assembly commissioners. Previous General Assemblies have voted on other complex issues such as bio-diversity, the management of Alaska's north slope, end of life issues, and stem cell research. In comparison, this decision is to simply affirm the Church's confession that Jesus is the only Savior and Lord of the world.
  • The exercise of a church officer's conscience is bound by The Book of Confessions and the Book of Order. The entire witness of The Book of Confessions and Book of Order is unequivocal about Jesus as the only Lord and Savior of the world (e.g. The Book of Confessions: 5.077, 8.11, 9.11, 9.27; Book of Order: G-1.0100a, G-3.0300a, G-14.0207a, G-14.0405b(1)). Upholding the confession that Jesus is the only Savior and Lord of the world is every church officer's responsibility.
Will the 214th General Assembly be faithful to the clear Scriptural witness, The Book of Confessions, the Book of Order, and their ordination vows? Will this General Assembly act as a confessional and connectional church; or will freedom of conscience contrary to Scripture, The Book of Confessions, and the Book of Order remain unrestrained to the detriment of the health and integrity of the church? Will this General Assembly change our most basic identity in Jesus Christ; or will this General Assembly be compelled to joyfully proclaim, not refer or defer, the most basic confession of the Church: Jesus is the only Savior and Lord of the world!

Respond to this article
2002 General Assembly news index
Home · News · PLC Publications · The Presbyterian Layman
Online Reviews · Archives · History of the Lay Committee · Feedback · Links