logo


The 20/20 General Assembly:
Little done to end hemorrhage


By John H. Adams
The Layman Online
Monday, June 2, 2003
215th General Assembly
Denver, Colo.
May 24-31, 2003

General Assembly news index
DENVER – For the official record, it was the 215th General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (USA) that met May 24-31 in Denver. Unofficially, call it the 20/20 assembly.

The two 20s stand for the 20th anniversary of the reunion of the Northern and Southern mainline branches of the denomination in 1983 and the 20-percent fallout that has occurred since then.

The denomination lost another 41,000 members in 2002, commissioners were told – the highest percentage loss (1.64 percent) in a single year since before reunion. The new denomination that emerged in 1983 with 3.2 million members now has fewer than 2.45 million.

The 215th General Assembly did little to end the hemorrhage and maybe exacerbated the reasons for acrimony by:
  • Electing Susan R. Andrews, an avowed opponent of the constitutional "fidelity/chastity" law, as moderator. At one point during the assembly, she called on gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgendered people to stand in a display of their "pain."
  • Ducking any real possibility of ensuring that the Constitution of the Presbyterian Church (USA) is upheld.
  • Reaffirming the 214th General Assembly's decision to make the PCUSA the only mainline denomination in the nation that approves of partial-birth abortion – which includes the killing of an infant even in the process of delivery.
  • Passing the buck on ordination requirements to the Theological Task Force on Peace, Unity and Purity – and also giving the task force the permission to meet secretly to discuss controversial theological issues.
  • Continuing to give more money to the foundering World Council of Churches than any other U.S. denomination (about $1.2 million).
  • Singling out the gay-lesbian-bisexual-transgender community for aid through special "pastoral resources."
  • Defeating an overture that calls for more accountability in budgeting priorities so that commissioners might better determine whether the declining gifts of Presbyterians are advancing the kingdom of God.
  • Keeping alive a controversial report by the Advisory Committee on Social Witness Policy titled "Living Faithfully: Families in Transition." Instead of killing the report – which would place homosexual partners on par with a man and a woman as a godly example of a "family" – the commissioners referred it back to ACSWP with a rider: Get some help from the PCUSA's Office of Theology and Worship.
  • Rejecting a proposal to require the review of Stated Clerk Clifton Kirkpatrick's authority to sign amicus curiae briefs in support of various judicial views. One of his recent briefs supports a Brazilian sect's right to use a hallucinatory drug in its "religious" rituals. The rituals have nothing to do with Christianity or any other traditional faith group.
Not all the assembly did will prolong controversy. Some of the actions will probably be remembered – and acted upon – by a few Presbyterians.

They included addressing global and national matters with a weakened voice: Palestine-Israel, a soft statement; the controversial Kyoto Protocol on the environment, yes; helping victims of AIDS in Africa, yes. For-profit private prisons, no.

There was at least one notable exception to the social-indignation agenda. An overture calling on the General Assembly to denounce General Motors for sponsoring a Christian music-preaching concert tour was disapproved. Thus, General Motors did not become the Taco Bell of 2003. (The 214th General Assembly called on Presbyterians to boycott the Mexican fast-food chain because its owners buy tomatoes through distributors that are picked by workers who say they aren't adequately paid.)

The theme of the 215th General Assembly was a House of Prayer for All People. The "all people" focused – through the General Assembly's official Bible study, some of the worship services and much of the debate – on gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgendered people who say they the victims of church discrimination.

But one thing was inclusive. At several of the sessions, in prayers and pronouncements, God the father was referred to as "him" and "her."

Respond to this article
Home · News · PLC Publications · The Presbyterian Layman
Online Reviews · Archives · History of the Lay Committee · Feedback · Links