![]() Committee rejects ACSWP's family paper; approves one written by its own members Paula R. Kincaid The Layman Online Wednesday, May 28, 2003
Instead of the "Living Faithfully with Families in Transition" report from the Advisory Committee on Social Witness Policy (ACSWP), the Committee on National Issues voted to approve a statement written by committee members and send it to the 215th General Assembly. The statement was approved Tuesday afternoon by a vote of 32-22-1, and recommends that commissioners approve the two-page document, which reads in part:
The Rev. Marjorie Working of Santa Barbara Presbytery, who presented the statement approved by the committee, said: "I think the church needs to speak positively on this I think what we have done is to retain some of the main affirmations of the original work and, yet, we have also lifted up a Biblical view We have spoken to affirming people in all sorts of situations, but calling them into life with Jesus Christ." Youth Advisory Delegate Chris Jessen of Ohio Valley Presbytery spoke in favor of the paper written by committee members, saying that there is no such thing as "the ideal family. It is a concept we need to work around. It brings out the significance of the bond of marriage and has a stronger theological and moral basis." The Rev. Taylor Hill of Tampa Bay Presbytery, speaking in favor of the ACSWP report, said, "I do not believe the changes lift up the Biblical perspective nearly as much as the original does. I do not want to lower the standards of the church. I want to raise the standards of the church. I believe the Bible, but some of us understand what Jesus said a little bit differently." Elder Janice Harris of Newton Presbytery said she favored the ACSWP statement because it had more depth and much more Biblical grounding. "We can go back and forth on Biblical things," she said, adding that there are "Christians that happen to be gay, there are Christians that happen to be single." A minority report is being prepared and will be presented during the committee's report to the full assembly later this week. |
||
Respond to this article |
||
| Home
· News
· PLC
Publications ·
The
Presbyterian Layman Online Reviews · Archives · History of the Lay Committee · Feedback · Links |
||