![]() PCUSA agencies oppose 3 overtures seeking to overturn abortion policy By Craig M. Kibler The Layman Online Friday, June 11, 2004 Three overtures seeking to overturn the Presbyterian Church (USA)'s policy on abortion are being opposed by denominational agencies as "unnecessary" and that they "obscure current policy." The overtures 11-01, 11-02 and 11-03 will be decided at the 216th General Assembly when it meets June 26-July 3 in Richmond. The overtures, if approved, radically would alter what the denomination has to say about abortion. Previous General Assemblies have both sanctioned abortion including so-called partial-birth or late-term abortion while, at the same time, instructing Presbyterians to heed the moral opposition of those who oppose abortion. But that moral opposition rarely has been heeded by denominational leaders. Instead, as is the case with the agencies opposing these overtures, they almost always align with pro-abortion groups. In March, for example, the Washington Office helped sponsor a political march in Washington, D.C., to oppose any restrictions on abortion. The Washington Office does not promote any alternatives to abortion, such as adoption. Instead, it spends its resources and time advocating abortion with no moral restraints on when a woman may have such a procedure. Citing numerous Bible verses to state its case, Overture 11-01 by the Presbytery of Upper Ohio Valley calls on commissioners to end the denomination's sanction of abortion, which includes the termination of a baby's life in the process of delivery. "In the light of God's revealed word in Scripture and in adherence to our own historical standards of the Reformation," the overture calls for a constitutional amendment opposing abortion in the denomination's Book of Order. The overture would allow only one exception: to protect the life of a mother when she is "truly endangered." The overture would add this paragraph to the Book of Order:
Both the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives have approved bills that would ban late-term or partial-birth abortions, and President George W. Bush signed the measure into law. It is on hold pending appeals in the court system. The overture is opposed by the Advisory Committee on the Constitution, which is recommending that commissioners reject it because "The Book of Order is a document that declares the manner and means by which we govern ourselves as a provisional demonstration of the Body of Christ and how we interact with one another. While there are declarative statements in the document, they serve primarily as foundational statements in matters of governance, and not as social pronouncements." After recommending that commissioners disapprove the overture, the Advisory Committee on the Constitution then says, "It is for the General Assembly, not this advisory committee, to determine the wisdom of such a change in policy" on abortion. The overture also is opposed by the Advisory Committee on Social Witness Policy, which calls it "unnecessary, dishonest, misleading" and that it "errs in its understanding of current policy on problem pregnancies." Overture 11-02, from the Presbytery of Charlotte with concurrence from the Presbytery of John Knox, calls on the 216th General Assembly to:
". . . after a human life has begun, it is . . . cherished and protected as a precious gift of God, [and] The strong Christian presumption is that since all life is precious to God, we are to preserve and protect it. (Problem Pregnancies and Abortion, the General Assembly's current policy, 1992, p. 11; see also Minutes, 1992, Part I, p. 369 and 368 respectively) and "That the 209th General Assembly (1997) offer a word of counsel to the church and our culture that the procedure known as intact dilation and extraction (commonly called "partial birth" abortion) of a baby who could live outside the womb is of grave moral concern that should be considered only if the mother's physical life is endangered by the pregnancy. (Minutes, 1997, Part I, p. 65) "The Scriptures, our confessions, and church policy all support the effort to avoid death as an outcome in situations of need, including abortion, and to seek ways to affirm and protect the lives of human beings, such that in late-term pregnancies, particularly, where babies could live if delivered live, the church is called to speak and act in ways that protect the lives and health of the unborn as well as their mothers," the overture states. The Advocacy Committee for Women's Concerns, in opposing the overture, warns commissioners that approving the overture would "negate the work of careful study conducted by committees for two General Assemblies (2002 and 2003). Item 11-02 greatly restricts the positions past General Assemblies have approved. If approved, this misleading rendering of policy could become current policy." The Advisory Committee on Social Witness Policy also opposes it, citing the same grounds on which it opposed Overture 11-01. Overture 11-03, from the Presbytery of Beaver-Butler, seeks to clarify late-term abortions. It calls on:
|
|
Respond to this article |
|
| Home
· Archives
· The
Layman ·
PLC
Publications Presbyterian Lay Committee · Feedback · Links |
|