Washington Office says paper removed from Web site urging defeat of Marriage Amendment 'being corrected' The Layman Online Monday, September 27, 2004 The Washington Office of the Presbyterian Church (USA), which removed from its Web site a paper that directly violated the instructions of the 216th General Assembly regarding lobbying against the proposed Federal Marriage Amendment, now says that the paper is "being corrected." The Layman Online reported Thursday that eight denominational agencies in the paper prepared as an "Election Year Packet" urge "Congress to reject any proposed amendment to the federal Constitution that would prohibit the marriage of same-gender persons," saying that this was the action of the 216th General Assembly. Commissioners, who met June 26-July 3 in Richmond, instructed all agencies to cease lobbying against the amendment, approving a statement that read: "Nothing the 216th General Assembly (2004) has said or acted upon is to be construed to state or imply a position for or against the Federal Marriage Amendment. General Assembly entities shall not advocate for or against the Federal Marriage Amendment." On Friday afternoon, The Layman Online reported that the paper, titled "Personal Reflection and Group Study Guide," in the "Christian & Citizen" packet had been removed from the Web site without an explanation from the Washington Office. On Saturday, in place of the titled "Personal Reflection and Group Study Guide" section, the Washington Office posted the following note, dated. Sept. 24: "The 'Personal Reflection and Group Study Guide' section of the Christian & Citizen packet is being corrected. Revisions will be posted soon." On Monday morning, no revisions had been posted on the Washington Office Web site. There was no explanation as to why the original paper, which was disseminated churchwide, contained material in direct violation of the General Assembly's mandate. There also was no explanation as to what the corrections entailed. In another story, The Layman Online reported that the same section called civil rights for same-gender couples "marriage" – in contravention of the PCUSA's Constitution and directly violating the instructions of the 216th General Assembly. Commissioners to the 216th General Assembly approved a statement that reads: "The 216th General Assembly (2004) does the following: Offers prayerful thanks for the Scriptures informing us that all persons are created in the image of God (Gen. 1:27). Affirms the PCUSA historic definition of the meaning of marriage as a civil contract between a woman and a man' (W-4.9001, as quoted in a resolution of the 208th General Assembly (1996), Minutes, 1996, Part 1, p. 122) Declares that all persons are entitled to equal treatment under the law (Constitution of the United States of America); therefore Urges state legislations to change state laws to include the right of same-gender persons to civil union and, thereby, to extend to them all the benefits, privileges, and responsibilities of civil union, and urges all persons to support such changes in state laws. Urges the Congress of the United States of America to recognize those state laws that allow same-gender union and to change federal laws to recognize all civil unions licensed and solemnized under state law to apply in all federal laws that provide benefits, privileges, and/or responsibilities to married persons." This statement was recommended by the General Assembly commissioners' Committee on National Issues to the full General Assembly, which approved it with an amendment incorporating the denomination's historic definition of marriage. Earlier, the committee had rejected a proposed resolution that called on commissioners to "Recognize Civil Marriage for Same-Gender Couples." This rejected resolution, however, was included in the "Election Year Packet" prepared by the Washington Office as representing the action of the 216th General Assembly. The packet substituted in every instance the word "marriage" for the word "unions," left out the denomination's historic definition of marriage, and incorporated language not in the approved statement.

Respond to this article

Home · Archives · The Layman · PLC Publications Presbyterian Lay Committee · Feedback · Links