![]() Investigating committee declines trial in gay-marriage accusation By John H. Adams The Layman Online Wednesday, April 13, 2005 Despite evidence that a Presbyterian minister violated the constitution's prohibition against conducting marriage services for same-sex couples, an investigating committee for Mission Presbytery in Texas decided that the minister should not face trial.
Fifty same-sex couples were married that day in defiance of Texas state law and, in Rigby's case, the Presbyterian Church (USA)'s prohibition against ministers performing anything akin to a marriage service for homosexual couples. The Daily Texan quoted Rigby as saying, ""We're not staging this as a Las Vegas-style wedding chapel. We're talking about faithful relationships. Marriage is not about sexuality or making babies." Nonetheless, the presbytery's investigating committee dismissed an accusation against Rigby by Robert Brown, a student at the University of Texas, and the Rev. Dr. William J. Parr, his home church pastor in Carrollton, Texas. They contended that Rigby violated his ordination vows by conducting the services in defiance of the PCUSA constitution and rulings by the denomination's highest judicial body, the Permanent Judicial Commission of the General Assembly. Brown and Parr were represented by Paul Rolf Jensen, a Presbyterian lawyer who has filed numerous complaints against ministers who openly stated that they are in homosexual relationships. The investigating committee notified Jensen that "we have completed our investigation and will not file charges." On behalf of Brown and Parr, Jensen appealed to the Mission Presbytery Permanent Judicial Commission to review the decision of the investigating committee. "The grounds for this petition are that overwhelming evidence was presented to the Investigating Committee of the truth of the accusations, which evidence therefore constituted such cause to file charges such that the decision of the Investigating Committee not to file charges constituted an abuse of its discretion and a failure to fulfill its duties under D-10.0202," he said in the petition for review. Jensen said the evidence before the committee "constituted clear and unequivocal evidence" of grounds for the accusation, including:
|
|||
Respond to this article |
|||
| Home
· Archives
· The
Layman ·
PLC
Publications Presbyterian Lay Committee · Feedback · Links |
|||