logo



24th presbytery considering
resolutions on ordinations


The Layman Online
Wednesday, October 25, 2006
Presbyteries responding to calls
for Constitutional enforcement

Presbytery Congs. Members Actions
1 Central Florida 74 29,905 Affirmed constitutional standards
2 Donegal 62 22,822 Resolution under review
3 Eastminster 54 11,578 Seven resolutions under review
4 Holston 66 8,367 Referred to Bills and Overtures
5 Mississippi 46 6,205 Affirmed constitutional standards
6 Pittsburgh 153 43,855 Affirmed constitutional standards
7 Sacramento 42 15,941 Affirmed constitutional standards
8 San Diego 31 16,741 Affirmed constitutional standards
9 San Francisco 77 28,132 Considers competing proposals
10 Scioto Valley 113 23,940 Review scheduled
11 Sierra Blanca 22 2,162 Under review
12 Utah 24 4,009 Review at Oct. 13-14 meeting
13 Western N.C. 115 19,937 Affirmed standards but approved exemption on case-by-case basis
14 Whitewater Valley 68 23,289 Second reading Dec. 6
15 South Louisiana 67 10,322 Affirmed constitutional standards
16 New Covenant 109 39,416 Affirmed constitutional standards
17 Beaver-Butler 87 15,329 Affirmed constitutional standards
18 James 113 28,259 Vote on Oct. 10
19 San Joaquin 34 7,980 Affirmed constitutional standards
20 Olympia 50 10,800 Affirmed constitutional standards
21 Santa Barbara 30 9,378 Under review
22 Santa Fe 43 7,118 Under review
23 Mid-South 65 11,023 Affirmed constitutional standards
24 Cherokee 41 11,036 Under review
The Presbytery of Cherokee in Georgia has joined the list of presbyteries that are considering – or have adopted – resolutions that affirm the ordination requirements in the Presbyterian Church (USA).

The proposed Cherokee resolution states:
In its discernment of the essentials of Reformed polity and for the sake of the peace, unity, and purity of the church, Cherokee Presbytery adopts the principle that compliance with the standards for ordination adopted by the whole church in the Book of Order is an essential of Reformed polity. Therefore, any departure from the standards for ordination expressed in the Book of Order will bar a candidate from ordination or installation by this governing body. Provisions of the Book of Order are signified as being standards by use of the term "shall," "is," "are to be," "requirement," or equivalent expression.
The rationale for the overture says:
The 217th General Assembly adopted an authoritative interpretation (AI) that appears to permit a presbytery to ordain or install a candidate whose personal conduct does not meet the precise requirements of the Book of Order, if the presbytery determines that the departure from the requirements does not constitute a failure to adhere to the essentials of Reformed polity. In effect, it means that the presbyteries may decide which requirements are essential. Adoption of this policy will make it clear that the presbytery considers all ordination requirements that are mandates of the Book of Order to be essentials of Reformed polity.
The Cherokee resolution is the 24th reported to The Layman Online in response to the 2006 General Assembly's approval of an authoritative interpretation that gives ordaining bodies the option to decide that the ordination requirement is not an essential. Twelve presbyteries have voted to abide by the "fidelity/chastity" requirement in the Book of Order. None has voted against that requirement. Eleven presbyteries are reviewing their proposals before taking a vote.

Respond to this article
Home · Archives · The Layman · PLC Publications
Presbyterian Lay Committee · Feedback · Links