logo



Number of presbyteries
reviewing or approving
'essentials' is growing


The Layman Online
Tuesday, October 3, 2006
Presbyteries responding to calls
for Constitutional enforcement

Presbytery Congs. Members Actions
1 Central Florida 74 29,905 Affirmed constitutional standards
2 Donegal 62 22,822 Resolution under review
3 Eastminster 54 11,578 Seven resolutions under review
4 Holston 66 8,367 Referred to Bills and Overtures
5 Mississippi 46 6,205 Affirmed constitutional standards
6 Pittsburgh 153 43,855 Affirmed constitutional standards
7 Sacramento 42 15,941 Affirmed constitutional standards
8 San Diego 31 16,741 Affirmed constitutional standards
9 San Francisco 77 28,132 Considers competing proposals
10 Scioto Valley 113 23,940 Review scheduled
11 Sierra Blanca 22 2,162 Under review
12 Utah 24 4,009 Review at Oct. 13-14 meeting
13 Western N.C. 115 19,937 Affirmed standards but approved exemption on case-by-case basis
14 Whitewater Valley 68 23,289 Second reading Dec. 6
15 South Louisiana 67 10,322 Affirmed constitutional standards
16 New Covenant 109 39,416 Affirmed constitutional standards
17 Beaver-Butler 87 15,329 Affirmed constitutional standards
18 James 113 28,259 Vote on Oct. 10
19 San Joaquin 34 7,980 Affirmed constitutional standards
20 Olympia 50 10,800 Affirmed constitutional standards
21 Santa Barbara 30 9,378 Under review
The number of presbyteries that have either approved resolutions that affirm the constitutional ordination requirements of the Book of Order or have received proposals calling for similar action has grown to 21 – 12.1 percent of the 173 presbyteries in the Presbyterian Church (USA).

Collectively, those presbyteries serve 1,437 congregations, 13.1 percent of the 10,960 churches in the denomination, and 378,367 Presbyterians, 16.3 percent of the denomination's 2.31 million members.

Ten of the 21 presbyteries have already approved resolutions declaring that the ordination requirements are essential in response to the 2006 General Assembly's authoritative interpretation that declares that ordaining bodies can decide whether or not to allow exemptions for candidates who are practicing homosexuals. Eleven presbyteries have not taken final action on the resolutions.

In one case, the Presbytery of Western North Carolina affirmed the ordination requirements as essential, but also approved a resolution saying that ordination requests would be considered on a case-by-case basis. None of the 21 presbyteries has defeated a resolution affirming the ordination requirements.

The most recent additions to the list are:
  • The Presbytery of San Joaquin in California: "For the sake of the peace, unity, and purity of the church, the Presbytery of San Joaquin adopts and shall function according to the following principle: it is an essential of Reformed polity that the Presbytery of San Joaquin comply with and adhere to the standards for ordination adopted by the whole church and expressed in the Book of Order. Therefore, any departure from ordination standards mandated* in the Book of Order shall bar a candidate from ordination and/or installation by the Presbytery of San Joaquin." [*ordination standards mandated in the Book of Order include those instructions designated by the terms "shall," "is/are to be," "requirement" or "equivalent expression."]
  • The Presbytery of the James in Virginia will consider the following resolution at its Oct. 10 meeting:
Whereas the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) has standards for ordination to church office in the Form of Government; and

Whereas these standards include educational requirements, a definite set of examinations, willingness to make certain vows, and a commitment to limit sexual expression to heterosexual marriage; and

Whereas the church has judged each of these standards necessary for good and sufficient reasons; and

Whereas the 217th General Assembly (2006) has issued an Authoritative Interpretation of G-6.0108, to the effect that ordaining bodies may decide whether a departure from one or more of our Constitutional standards touches something essential in our faith and polity,

THEREFORE, the Session of New Hanover Presbyterian Church respectfully overtures the Presbytery of the James to resolve:

1. That it is the policy of this Presbytery in every particular case to treat as essential all the standards for ordination and installation to church office in the Form of Government, including the requirement that deacons, elders, and ministers "live either in fidelity within the covenant of marriage between a man and a woman or in chastity in singleness" (G-6.0106b); and,

2. To resolve further that this Presbytery will neither offer nor accept any scruple about or exception to the constitutional standards for ordination and installation within its jurisdiction, except as provided in the Book ofOrder G-14.0313; and,

3. To direct that the Presbytery of the James' Manual of Administrative Operations and Standing Rules under section 1, Item D "Presbytery Norms" number 2 be revised to insert the following text: "All who participate in examinations of candidates for ordination or installation, including the candidates themselves, shall be made aware of the Presbytery's policy that each and every requirement for ordination and installation in the Form of Government is essential, including G-6.0106b, and the Presbytery does not offer or accept any scruple about or exception to them, except as provided in the Book of Order G-14.0313."
  • The Presbytery of Olympia in southeastern Washington approved the following resolution during its meeting on Sept. 21: "We hereby declare that in our discernment of the movement of the Holy Spirit, every mandate of the Book of Order (2005-2007) is an essential of reformed polity. Therefore, any violation of a mandate of the Book of Order (2005-2007) constitutes a failure to adhere to the essentials of reformed polity and thus presents a bar to ordination and installation."
  • The Presbytery of Santa Barbara in southwestern California is reviewing a resolution.

Respond to this article
Home · Archives · The Layman · PLC Publications
Presbyterian Lay Committee · Feedback · Links