logo



Ohio church wins first
round of legal dispute
with 'hierarchical' PCUSA


By John H. Adams
The Layman Online
Tuesday, October 10, 2006
About Hudson Presbyterian Church

Hudson Presbyterian Church in Hudson, Ohio, is a growing congregation with 502 members as of the end of 2005, according to the PCUSA's statistics.

Membership has increased 46.7 percent since D. Wayne Bogue became the pastor in 1997. Hudson is one of 1,314 congregations whose sessions approved affiliation with the Confessing Church Movement within the PCUSA.

In a statement published on its HPC Web site, the session says, "Our desire is to keep HPC faithful to Christ and His Church. This is our primary passion. And yet we find that many are straying from the historic, biblical, Christian faith, and are accommodating the timeless Gospel of Jesus Christ to the clamoring of culture. This has led to some to declare that Jesus Christ is not the only way of salvation, and that there are other ways one may attain salvation. These persons also do not believe that the Scriptures are the infallible written Word of God, our only authority for faith and life. Instead, they follow the latest ideologies. They declare that the ordering of human sexual relationships should be based on the desires of a broken people and culture rather than the Scriptures."
In a first-round battle pitting Hudson Presbyterian Church v. Eastminster Presbytery, an Ohio Court of Common Pleas magistrate issued a sweeping prohibition against the presbytery's interference in the congregation's consideration of a proposal to leave the Presbyterian Church (USA).

After a two-hour hearing on Oct. 6, the magistrate upheld a temporary restraining order previously signed by a trial judge. The magistrate denied the presbytery's "hierarchical" claim that it had the authority to intervene through an administrative commission and take over the governance of the church.

The Hudson session has scheduled a congregational meeting on Nov. 5 for a vote on the session's proposal to leave the PCUSA and join the Evangelical Presbyterian Church.

According to court documents, the presbytery was considering a number of steps to thwart the decision: an administrative commission to take over the congregation; dissolving the call of Hudson's pastor, D. Wayne Bogue; seeking to stir up opposition within the congregation to the proposal; usurping the congregation's charter as a nonprofit corporation under the laws of Ohio; and taking steps to cloud the congregation's title to the property.

The temporary restraining order enjoins the presbytery from:
  • "conducting or purporting to conduct any civil business matters on behalf of Hudson Presbyterian Church."
  • "interfering in any way with Hudson Presbyterian session's right to conduct business matters" on behalf of the congregation.
  • "interfering in any way with the congregational meeting."
  • "entering upon the lands and property" of the church "in any manner which might be disruptive of Hudson Presbyterian Church's operations."
  • "establishing or attempting to establish an administrative commission" to replace Hudson's duly elected session.
  • "affirmatively contacting the members" of the congregation "for the purposes of trying to establish an organized opposition to the conduct of business" by the session or "otherwise seeking to establish, foment, or create division or schism or dissention" within the congregation prior to the Nov. 5 vote.
  • "taking any action which would change, or which would attempt or purport to change, the control" of the congregation.
  • "taking any action that would change the pastoral relationship between" the congregation and its pastor, D. Wayne Bogue.
  • "interfering with any and all employment contracts or other contracts or other outstanding obligations" of the congregation.
  • "filing any documents against the mortgage or title … asserting or claiming title to any real property … or asserting a trust interest in the property … or otherwise taking actions which would have the effect of placing a cloud on the title" of any of the church's real or personal property.
  • "initiating any disciplinary action against the ministers or ordained members" of the church.
(The Layman Online's copies of court documents, filed before minor changes in the restraining order were approved by the magistrate, include the Hudson session's motion for a temporary restraining order, the restraining order as originally signed by the trial judge, and the presbytery's request for a temporary restraining order. The magistrate approved the restraining order with the acknowledgement that the presbytery did have ecclesiological rights but not to the extent of interfering with the actions of the Hudson session.)

The Hudson session, concerned that Eastminster would attempt to take over control of the congregation, filed a request for a temporary restraining order on Sept. 28. That request was signed by Judge Mary Spicer. The presbytery responded with a request for a temporary restraining order that would have ended Spicer's order and allowed the presbytery to proceed in taking over the congregation.

The motions presented at the hearing addressed emerging tactical and legal issues common in the intense disputes over the denomination's claim that a congregation has no right to leave the denomination with its property. The arguments made by the presbytery paralleled the denomination's legal strategy that was revealed in "privileged and confidential" documents that were leaked by an unknown source to the Presbyterian Lay Committee. The presbytery's motion was scripted closely to the hardball legal strategy outlined in those documents.

Forrest A. Norman III, a partner in the law firm of Gallagher Sharp and a deacon at Hudson Presbyterian, argued the case for the session. Three attorneys represented Eastminster Presbytery, including Terrence L. Seeberger and T. Christopher O'Connell of Stark & Knoll in Akron.

The lawyers' motions included these contrasting views:

Hudson Eastminster Presbytery
"HPC's bylaws designate 'session' as the governing body of the Church for both ecclesiastical and secular matters." "The dispute focuses solely on an ecclesiastical matter within a hierarchical church."
"HPC's articles of incorporation and bylaws permit it to voluntarily affiliate with a denomination of its choosing." "Hudson Presbyterian continues to take unauthorized actions to the detriment of congregation members, Eastminster Presbytery and PCUSA."
"It is apparent that Eastminster is anxious to stop HPC's congregation from voting, and is taking steps to hinder HPC's ability to function as a corporate entity in order to try to derail the process of re-affiliation." The PCUSA "is a recognized Presbyterian denomination in the United States. As a hierarchical church, PCUSA and its representative bodies are regulated pursuant to the Constitution of the PCUSA …"
"Eastminster Presbytery seeks to replace HPC's session with an administrative commission of its choosing. The administrative commission would presumably take, or attempt to take, corporate actions into its own hands and control … which HPC is expressly entitled to resist pursuant O.R.C. § 1702.12." "Eastminster Presbytery is responsible for the mission and government of all local congregations within northeast Ohio. Accordingly, Eastminster has the authority ... to assume original jurisdiction in any case in which it determines that a session cannot exercise its authority … only Eastminster Presbytery has the authority to sever the relationship between Hudson Presbyterian and PCUSA."
The Hudson bylaws say that the "Session shall be empowered to hold property in trust as allowed at law, reserving the right of revocation in all instances. All property held in trust must be an expressed trust." The bylaws give the congregation the final authority in "matters relating to the buying, mortgaging or selling of real property." "The Session of Hudson Presbyterian may attempt … to transfer title of its property despite the fact that all property held by Hudson Presbytery is held in trust for the use and benefit of the PCUSA."
"Ohio Revised Code §1702 sets forth the authority of non-profit corporations." A non-profit may "resist a change or potential change in control of a corporation." "The resolution notes that a change of control by Eastminster Presbytery is not in the best interests of the entity to which the [Hudson Presbyterian] Board of Trustees is obligated to protect." The Ohio court "lacks jurisdiction over this dispute. … If a church is hierarchical, the court must decline jurisdiction. Even if this Court has jurisdiction over this dispute, the evidence before the Court clearly provides that all property held by local congregations is held in trust for the use and benefit of the PCUSA."


In preparation for its congregational meeting, the Hudson leaders have held several briefing sessions with members. They have also invited presbytery officials to attend one of those sessions and to make comments from the floor – an invitation that is not prohibited by the restraining order.

While the dispute between Hudson and the presbytery is heated, Norman, who is a new director of the Presbyterian Lay Committee, expressed his hope that "cooler heads will be able to prevail and that we will effect a gracious separation."

Respond to this article
Home · Archives · The Layman · PLC Publications
Presbyterian Lay Committee · Feedback · Links