logo



Session asks Santa Fe
Presbytery to support
ordination requirements


The Layman Online
Wednesday, October 18, 2006
Presbyteries responding to calls
for Constitutional enforcement

Presbytery Congs. Members Actions
1 Central Florida 74 29,905 Affirmed constitutional standards
2 Donegal 62 22,822 Resolution under review
3 Eastminster 54 11,578 Seven resolutions under review
4 Holston 66 8,367 Referred to Bills and Overtures
5 Mississippi 46 6,205 Affirmed constitutional standards
6 Pittsburgh 153 43,855 Affirmed constitutional standards
7 Sacramento 42 15,941 Affirmed constitutional standards
8 San Diego 31 16,741 Affirmed constitutional standards
9 San Francisco 77 28,132 Considers competing proposals
10 Scioto Valley 113 23,940 Review scheduled
11 Sierra Blanca 22 2,162 Under review
12 Utah 24 4,009 Review at Oct. 13-14 meeting
13 Western N.C. 115 19,937 Affirmed standards but approved exemption on case-by-case basis
14 Whitewater Valley 68 23,289 Second reading Dec. 6
15 South Louisiana 67 10,322 Affirmed constitutional standards
16 New Covenant 109 39,416 Affirmed constitutional standards
17 Beaver-Butler 87 15,329 Affirmed constitutional standards
18 James 113 28,259 Vote on Oct. 10
19 San Joaquin 34 7,980 Affirmed constitutional standards
20 Olympia 50 10,800 Affirmed constitutional standards
21 Santa Barbara 30 9,378 Under review
22 Santa Fe 43 7,118 Under review
Another presbytery has been asked to assert that it will not consider candidates for ordination who declare "scruples" in opposition to the "fidelity/chastity" ordination requirement in the Constitution of the Presbyterian Church (USA).

The resolution by the session of White Presbyterian Church in the Presbytery of Santa Fe is the 22nd reported to The Layman Online in response to the 2006 General Assembly's approval of an authoritative interpretation that gives ordaining bodies the option to decide that the ordination requirement is not an essential.

Santa Fe Presbytery voted by decisive margins in 1997, 1998 and 2001 against the ordination requirement.

The following is the text of the resolution:

Whereas, the 217th General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church, U.S.A., has adopted, in amended form, the Authoritative Interpretation of G-6.0108 that the Task Force on Peace, Unity, and Purity had commended to the whole church in Recommendation #5 of their report; and,

Whereas, this Authoritative Interpretation now permits an ordaining and/or installing body of the church – i.e., a Session or presbytery – to determine "reasonably," in a particular case and by a majority vote of its members, that a candidate's departure from the ordination/installation standard expressed in G-6.0106b is a departure in "non-essentials" and therefore no obstacle to sustaining his or her examination; and,

Whereas, the Preface of the Book of Order makes clear that terms such as "SHALL and IS TO BE/ARE TO BE signify practice that is mandated;" and,

Whereas, the ordination/installation standard in G-6.0106b is expressed in such terms, clearly signifying practice that is mandated for all ordaining/installing bodies of the church and that cannot be regarded by any such body as "non-essential," any and all other evidence of a candidate's fitness for office to the contrary notwithstanding; and,

Whereas, for an ordaining/installing body thus to act in accordance with the Authoritative Interpretation approved by the General Assembly puts at peril all other express provisions of the Book of Order that signify practice that is mandated, and threatens the constitutional order and confidence that unites the whole denomination;

THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED that the Presbytery of Santa Fe, acting this _____ day of ______________, 2006, makes the following public declaration, adopts it as policy in its own ordination/installation decisions, and commends it to all the Sessions within its bounds:

In its discernment of the essentials of Reformed polity and for the sake of the peace, unity, and purity of the church, this governing body adopts the principle that compliance with the standards for ordination set out explicitly for the whole church in the Book of Order is an essential of Reformed polity. Therefore, any departure from the standards for ordination expressed in the Book of Order will bar a candidate from ordination and/or installation by this governing body. Provisions of the Book of Order are signified as being standards by use of the term "shall," "is/are to be," "requirement," or equivalent expression.

Respond to this article
Home · Archives · The Layman · PLC Publications
Presbyterian Lay Committee · Feedback · Links