logo



Seven sessions ask presbytery
to stand by ordination standards


The Layman Online
Monday, November 27, 2006
Presbyteries responding to calls
for Constitutional enforcement

Presbytery Congs. Members Actions
1 Central Florida 74 29,905 Affirmed constitutional standards
2 Donegal 62 22,822 Original resolution defeated Nov. 14. Second resolution on agenda for January meeting.
3 Eastminster 54 11,578 Seven resolutions under review
4 Holston 66 8,367 Referred to Bills and Overtures
5 Mississippi 46 6,205 Affirmed constitutional standards
6 Pittsburgh 153 43,855 Affirmed constitutional standards
7 Sacramento 42 15,941 Affirmed constitutional standards. Synod PJC asked to compel presbytery to rescind resolution.
8 San Diego 31 16,741 Affirmed constitutional standards
9 San Francisco 77 28,132 Considers competing proposals
10 Scioto Valley 113 23,940 Deferred to June 2007.
11 Sierra Blanca 22 2,162 Under review
12 Utah 24 4,009 Review at Oct. 13-14 meeting
13 Western N.C. 115 19,937 Affirmed standards but approved exemption on case-by-case basis
14 Whitewater Valley 68 23,289 Second reading Dec. 6
15 South Louisiana 67 10,322 Affirmed constitutional standards
16 New Covenant 109 39,416 Affirmed constitutional standards
17 Beaver-Butler 87 15,329 Affirmed constitutional standards
18 James 113 28,259 Referred to committee.
19 San Joaquin 34 7,980 Affirmed constitutional standards. Synod PJC asked to compel presbytery to rescind resolution.
20 Olympia 50 10,800 Affirmed constitutional standards
21 Santa Barbara 30 9,378 Not reported.
22 Santa Fe 43 7,118 Under review
23 Mid-South 65 11,023 Affirmed constitutional standards. Synod PJC asked to compel presbytery to rescind resolution.
24 Cherokee 41 11,036 Vote on Nov. 28.
25 Great Rivers 110 19,818 Vote on Feb. 27.
26 Grace 180 45,040 Under review.
27 Redstone 85 16,288 Voted Nov. 21 to rule the proposal unconstitutional.
28 Tampa Bay 75 24,821 To be introduced on floor of presbytery on Nov. 30
29 Western Reserve 52 14,202 Resolution submitted to presbytery by seven sessions.
30 Nevada 24 5345 Voted 42-20 to affirm standards.
In spite of complaints being filed by denominational loyalists after their presbyteries voted not to allow exceptions to the "fidelity/chastity" ordination requirements, the sessions of seven congregations have asked Western Reserve Presbytery to uphold the requirements.

The governing bodies of Bay Presbyterian Church, Christ Presbyterian Church First Presbyterian Church Ashtabula, Glenville New Life Community Church, Highland Sixth Presbyterian Church, Northfield Presbyterian Church and Pierpont Presbyterian Church submitted their joint overture on Nov. 27.

They asked the presbytery to approve a resolution stating:
1. "That it is the policy of this Presbytery to treat as essential all the standards for ordination and installation to church office in the Form of Government, including the requirement that deacons, elders and ministers "live either in fidelity within the covenant of marriage between a man and a woman or in chastity in singleness" (G-6.0106b); and

2. "To resolve further that this Presbytery will neither offer nor accept any scruple about or exception to the Constitutional standards for ordination and installation within its jurisdiction, except as provided in the Book of Order G-14.0313; and

3. "To direct that the Presbytery's Policy and Procedures for Care of Inquirers and Candidates for the Ministry of Word and Sacrament be revised to insert the following text: All who participate in examinations of candidates for ordination or installation, including the candidates themselves, shall be made aware of the Presbytery's policy that each and every requirement for ordination and installation in the Form of Government is essential, including G-6.0106b, and the Presbytery does not offer or accept any scruple about or exception to them, except as provided in the Book of Order G-14.0313."
Western Reserve is the 30th presbytery to receive a resolution supporting G-6.0106b since the 2006 General Assembly approved an authoritative interpretation that allows ordaining bodies to grant exceptions to the "fidelity/chastity" clause.

Twelve presbyteries have approved resolutions. But remedial complaints have been filed with synod Permanent Judicial Commissions challenging the authority of three presbyteries to express their opposition to the General Assembly by holding fast to the constitutional requirements.

The complaints ask the synod courts to require the presbyteries of Olympia, Sacramento and the Mid-South to rescind their resolutions.

Also, General Assembly Stated Clerk Clifton Kirpatrick has expressed his opposition to presbyteries' resolving to uphold G-6.0106b.

In a Sept. 8 letter to the stated clerks of the 173 presbyteries in the Presbyterian Church (USA), Kirkpatrick said, "I am particularly concerned about proposals that I hear are coming to some of our presbyteries that are not in accord with our Constitution and its authoritative interpretations (which also have the binding authority of the Constitution itself). I hope, in your role as stated clerks, you will join me in reminding Presbyterians that while dissent and advocacy for change are deeply engrained Presbyterian values, no presbytery by any vote margin has the authority to take actions that are not in accord with the Constitution, or to set aside its provisions."

Respond to this article
Home · Archives · The Layman · PLC Publications
Presbyterian Lay Committee · Feedback · Links