Overtures challenge ordination standard By Robert P. Mills The Presbyterian Layman Volume 34, Number 2 Posted March 26, 2001
Opponents of the denominations historic policy have had two years to prepare their assault. Last years assembly refused to address the issue, referring seven overtures to this years meeting in the hometown of the denominations headquarters. One overture to delete the fidelity and chastity provision, G-6.0106b of the denominations Book of Order, comes from Mid-Kentucky Presbytery, which, until its recent renaming, was known as Louisville Presbytery. Lines of attack G-6.0106b opponents have opened several lines of attack. Some, like that of Mid-Kentucky, simply want the paragraph removed. Others, like that from New York City Presbytery, not only want the standard removed, but also ask the assembly to issue an authoritative interpretation of the constitution that would declare that our denominations pronouncements upon the ordination of homosexual persons and subsequent adoption of G-6.0106b were in error. Baltimore Presbytery has dictated a lengthy authoritative interpretation for the assembly, explicitly approving the ordination of homosexual persons in faithful, monogamous relationships. Baltimore does not say why its interpretation would not apply to homosexual persons not in faithful, monogamous relationships. Santa Fe Presbytery proposes to move the PCUSA away from its connectional heritage toward a congregational form of government by inserting provisions for a waiver of G-6.0106b in the constitution. Santa Fe does not extend its local option approach to the ordination of women. Heartland Presbytery is pursuing the strategy employed by the Syracuse assembly in 1997 leaving the Book of Order number intact while so revising its content that the intent of the original entirely disappears. Syracuses handiwork, which became known as Amendment A, was defeated by a 2-1 margin in the presbyteries. As The Presbyterian Layman goes to press, nearly one-third of the overtures that will be considered by the Louisville assembly deal with G-6.0106b. |
||
| Respond
to this article |
||
| Home
· News
· PLC
Publications ·
The
Presbyterian Layman Online Reviews · Archives · History of the Lay Committee · Feedback · Links |
||