|
|
The Layman November 2003 Volume 36, Number 5 Posted November 24, 2003 |
|
Conscience-driven stewardship The highest court in the Presbyterian Church (USA) has now twice declared that a church may neither be compelled to pay nor punished for failure to pay any amounts requested by higher governing bodies in per-capita apportionments. It has also declared that, nonetheless, there is a high moral obligation based on the grace and call of God to participate fully in the covenant community. But the covenant community depends on reciprocal responsibility. Morality is not blind submission to anyones platform. There is nothing absolutely moral about being liberal or conservative, whether the arena is politics or the church. Christians in particular are called to serve God in Christ, through the power of the Holy Spirit, with unwavering commitment to moral and Biblical values. Essentially, the Presbyterian Lay Committee, in its Declaration of Conscience, is calling on individuals and sessions to weigh prayerfully the moral consequences of their stewardship options. To the Galatians, a church that had lost its moral footing by substituting its own regulations for the gospel of grace through Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul addressed the obligation this way: For do I now persuade men, or God? Or do I seek to please men? For if I still please men, I would not be a bondservant of Christ. The moral obligation is to determine the will of Christ and to please him. In the case of the Presbyterian Church (USA), there have been too many instances in which the decisions of the churchs governing bodies and the activities of the denominations employees are obviously not God-pleasing. (See pages 13-16.) Does it please God the Father to declare that he has been supplanted by a goddess named Sophia? Does it please God the Son to ask, as did a Presbyterian minister and keynote speaker at a denominational event, Whats the big deal about Jesus? Does it please God the Holy Spirit to claim, as some Presbyterians say the spirit now reveals, that fornication is moral in contradiction to the Spirited-breathed Word of God? Participating fully in the covenant community is not optional. But when the covenant community divides itself by decisions and actions that are at cross-purposes with Gods revelation in Christ and in Scripture, choices must be made. It boils down to a critical discernment: Which part of the covenant community is clearly committed to Gods will? Morality does not begin with self-asserted rights or confusion about Gods redemptive purposes. Our tithes and offerings are not merely contributions to our pet causes. They are our joyful response to what God has done and is doing to advance his kingdom on earth. |
|
| Respond
to this article Index of Layman editorials Home · News · PLC Publications · The Presbyterian Layman Online Reviews · Archives· History of the Lay Committee · Feedback · Links |
|