The Layman


Presbyterian group members
commend suspected terrorists

Anti-Israel organization is blamed in attacks that killed 270 Americans

By John H. Adams
The Layman
Volume 37, Number 4
Posted November 8, 2004

Global criticism of the Presbyterian Church (USA) over its position in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has intensified in the wake of statements by Presbyterians friendly to Hezbollah, which the U.S. lists as a terrorist group and blames for the deaths of 270 Americans in two bombings.

The denomination’s national office sought to refute the statements made in Beirut on Oct. 17 by Ron Stone, a member of the Advisory Committee on Social Witness Policy, and Nile Harper, chairman of the committee, during interviews by pro-Palestinian television stations. Stone and Harper were with an official 12-day, 24-member Presbyterian delegation touring the Mideast at an estimated cost of between $50,000 and $100,000 in per-capita funds contributed to the denomination.

“As an elder of our church, I’d like to say that, according to my recent experience, relations and conversations with Islamic leaders are a lot easier than dealings and dialogue with Jewish leaders,” said Stone, a retired professor of Christian ethics at Pittsburgh Theological Seminary.

“Also, we praise your initiative for dialogue and mutual understanding,” Stone added in comments that were broadcast on Al Manar, Hezbollah’s satellite television network. “We cherish these statements that bring us closer to you. We treasure the precious words of Hezbollah and your expression of goodwill towards the American people.”

Harper, a retired Presbyterian minister who lives in Ann Arbor, Mich., criticized as “unhelpful” Israel’s defensive separation barrier and said products made by U.S. corporations “are being used destructively against the Palestinians. The occupation by Israel in the West Bank and Gaza must end because it is oppressive and destructive for the Palestinian people.”

The statements by Stone and Harper “do not reflect the official position of the Presbyterian Church (USA) on peace in the Middle East,” according to the response by Stated Clerk Clifton Kirkpatrick, Moderator Rick Ufford-Chase and General Assembly Council Executive Director John Detterick. “The reports of this visit should not be interpreted in any way as lessening our deep commitment to continued Jewish-Christian dialogue, Muslim-Christian dialogue, or Jewish-Christian-Muslim dialogue.”

“The group’s specific itinerary was not authorized by any of us; in fact, once we learned of it, we asked the group to drop this visit from their plans,” the three denominational leaders said in a letter to Jewish leaders with whom they had met on Sept. 28. “Furthermore, the comments attributed to Presbyterians there, as we understand them, are reprehensible.”

They did not explain in the letter why the delegation refused to follow their request. Two high-ranking Presbyterian officials – Kathy Leuckert, Detterick’s deputy executive director, and Victor Makari, Mideast coordinator for the Worldwide Ministries Division – were part of the 24-member delegation.

Because of the comments by Stone and Harper, Gadi Golan, the head of the religious affairs bureau of Israel’s Foreign Ministry, canceled a scheduled meeting with the Presbyterian delegation, according to The Jerusalem Post.

And the Union for Reformed Judaism said the denomination’s response was lacking. “We are deeply disturbed by reports that leaders of the Presbyterian Church (USA) met with and praised leaders of Hezbollah. In light of our recent meetings and conversations, you can imagine how surprised and alarmed we were to hear of these meetings. We were also very troubled by your statement in response. Though you distance yourself by saying that the visit and the comments made at this meeting do not reflect the official position of the Presbyterian Church (USA), you fail to condemn the fact that an official delegation from your church met with a known terrorist entity whose stated enemies are the United States and the state of Israel.”

“By meeting with Hezbollah, the Presbyterian delegation lent legitimacy to what American government officials call the ‘A-Team’ of global terrorists,” the American Jewish Congress said. “In supporting the enemies of reconciliation, the Presbyterian action represents a blow to peace efforts in the region.”

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette said Stone “has ignited a furor for extolling Hezbollah, a radical Islamic group with a history of terrorist activity.” The newspaper noted that some of Stone’s fellow members at East Liberty Presbyterian Church did not agree with his statements.

The newspaper also quoted Jerry Van Marter, director of the Presbyterian News Service, as saying, “I think it’s safe to say that (Stone’s) statements as reported in the international press cannot help but worsen relations between the Presbyterian Church U.S.A. and Jewish groups.”

The PCUSA has been the target of growing criticism from Jewish, Christian and secular groups since the 216th General Assembly approved a resolution calling for withdrawal of denominational funds invested in corporations that do business with Israel.

The resolution did not call for any sanctions against Palestinian suicide bombings.

Members of the Advisory Committee on Social Witness Policy helped the General Assembly shape the divestment resolution. Through his membership on the East Liberty Presbyterian Church foundation board, Stone has raised money for some of the committee’s leftist causes.

The Advisory Committee on Social Witness Policy and the General Assembly Council paid for the trip by the Presbyterian delegation.

Van Marter told The Layman that he did not know all of the members of the Presbyterian delegation to the Mideast, but that they included Evan Silverstein, a writer for the news service; Sara P. Lisherness, coordinator of the Presbyterian Peacemaking Program; and Leuckert and Makari. The Layman also learned that Charles Wiley of the Office of Theology and Worship was a member of the delegation.

Other developments and responses since the General Assembly passed the divestment resolution:
  • The Anti-Defamation League said, “Coming in an atmosphere where interfaith relations between Presbyterians and Jews have been sorely tested by the church’s proposal to disinvest from Israel, it is disturbing that the Presbyterian leaders made the irresponsible decision to meet with Hezbollah, an organization whose self-stated goal is the total destruction of the Jewish State and the establishment of Islamic rule over Jerusalem. It is outrageous that, rather than seeking out moderate voices working for positive change in the Middle East, the Presbyterian leaders decided to seek out the leader of a terrorist organization.”
  • Dennis Prager, radio talk-show host and syndicated columnist, said, “It takes a particularly virulent strain of moral idiocy and meanness to single out Israel, not Arafat’s Palestinian Authority, or terror-supporting, death-fatwa-issuing Iran, or women-subjugating Saudi Arabia, for condemnation and economic ruin.”
  • Uwe Siemon-Netto, a Ph.D. Lutheran theologian who is the religious affairs editor of United Press International, wrote: “What makes activist church people look so pathetic is that, for all their good intentions, they have an infinite ability to make fools of themselves.”
  • The General Assembly Council, meeting in Louisville, Ky., the denomination’s headquarters, decided to try to control the damage to the denomination by sending a pastoral letter to Presbyterians.
  • Leaders of both the Board of Pensions of the Presbyterian Church (USA) and the Presbyterian Foundation, the two corporations that handle most of the denomination’s investment portfolios, said they may find it tough to comply with the General Assembly’s call for divestment because of their fiduciary responsibilities. The foundation has a $1.6 billion investment portfolio and the Board of Pensions has a $6.2-billion portfolio.
One of the specific targets of divestment is Caterpillar, which has sold earth-moving equipment to Israel to clear the path for its separation barrier.

The foundation and the Board of Pensions own 37,100 shares of stock in Caterpillar.

Caterpillar traded at $78.60 a share on Oct. 21, making the PCUSA holdings worth $2,960,000.

Caterpillar’s stock has had its ups and downs – not unlike other corporate stocks during the past two years. But the value of the stock has risen by 74.9 percent since February 2003.

Assuming that the Presbyterian Church (USA) owned an equal number of shares in February of 2003, the PCUSA would have turned a profit of $1,132,292 as of Tuesday. And much of that money would have gone into the mission budget, which has had a freefall since 2001 (from $144 million to $130 million).
Respond to this article
Home · News · PLC Publications · The Presbyterian Layman
Online Reviews · Archives · History of the Lay Committee · Feedback · Links